<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.occupyboston.org/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AWG%2FStrategies%2FIdeas%2FCampaign_Finance_Legislation</id>
	<title>Talk:WG/Strategies/Ideas/Campaign Finance Legislation - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.occupyboston.org/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AWG%2FStrategies%2FIdeas%2FCampaign_Finance_Legislation"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.occupyboston.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:WG/Strategies/Ideas/Campaign_Finance_Legislation&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-12T12:58:14Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.occupyboston.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:WG/Strategies/Ideas/Campaign_Finance_Legislation&amp;diff=7383&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Pcovery: Created page with &quot;Please leave your name or username and date in front of your comment in the section you.  ==== Discuss in this section:&amp;nbsp;S00772 Massachusetts call for the U.S. Congress to in...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.occupyboston.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:WG/Strategies/Ideas/Campaign_Finance_Legislation&amp;diff=7383&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2011-11-24T12:23:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Please leave your name or username and date in front of your comment in the section you.  ==== Discuss in this section: S00772 Massachusetts call for the U.S. Congress to in...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Please leave your name or username and date in front of your comment in the section you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Discuss in this section:&amp;amp;nbsp;S00772 Massachusetts call for the U.S. Congress to initiate a Constitutional amendment &amp;quot;to reverse Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and to&amp;amp;nbsp;restore Constitutional rights and fair elections to the people.&amp;quot; ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Susi 11/24: This seems like a good first step in a long process.&amp;amp;nbsp; It seems there's no point worrying about the text of the recommended amendment since that will be determined by pressure and votes later in the process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pcovery</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>