Talk:Working Groups: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m (deleted nav tree reference) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I like what you've done Eric. I like the alpha and the functional lists. And I like how you've categorized them. Thanks. I'd thought of doing it, but was afraid of the wrath I might suffer. Thanks for taking the hit. Terra | I like what you've done Eric. I like the alpha and the functional lists. And I like how you've categorized them. Thanks. I'd thought of doing it, but was afraid of the wrath I might suffer. Thanks for taking the hit. Terra | ||
==Navigation | ==='Navigation' suggestion removed=== | ||
... In favor of categorizing via category tags (whew...). - [[User:OneKarma|OneKarma]]<span style="letter-spacing: -2px"><sup>[[User talk:OneKarma|T]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/OneKarma|C]]</sub></span> 02:28, 31 December 2011 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:28, 31 December 2011
[Note to working groups: Please update list-serve and other contact information. --OneKarma 21:58, 12 November 2011 (EST)]
Avoiding Over-Reduction and Collapse
we must determine an hierarchy of WGs so that interested individuals can more easily find a place to share their ideas. we should have an easy to use forum in which everyone may collaborate. valid, constructive contribution should not require physical attendance, nor should it require hours of 'updating' oneself to the current affairs. i am working on a proposal to consolidate all of the working groups and forums regarding these notes. please visit my userpage to see these proposals, and let me know all of your thoughts and concerns.
- thank you, --OneKarma 13:51, 7 November 2011 (EST)
I like what you've done Eric. I like the alpha and the functional lists. And I like how you've categorized them. Thanks. I'd thought of doing it, but was afraid of the wrath I might suffer. Thanks for taking the hit. Terra
... In favor of categorizing via category tags (whew...). - OneKarmaT/C 02:28, 31 December 2011 (EST)