GA/Proposals/18: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Proposal: New process for creating a statement of demands. This dovetails with the spirit of proposals #15 & #17 above. ## Problem: A "list of demands" or "statements of purpose...") |
m (moved Prop-18 to GA/Proposals/18) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 17:20, 9 November 2011
Proposal: New process for creating a statement of demands. This dovetails with the spirit of proposals #15 & #17 above.
- Problem: A "list of demands" or "statements of purpose" seems like good ways to unite the movement behind a comprehensible (if general) platform
- As we've seen in recent GA sessions, a lengthy "list of demands" seems difficult to discuss in GA and takes too long to properly put through the consensus process.
- The person or group of persons who developed such a list may not be representative of the movement & diverse viewpoints may be lost.
- As we've seen in recent GA sessions, a lengthy "list of demands" seems difficult to discuss in GA and takes too long to properly put through the consensus process.
- Solution: Allocate time in GA to propose individual, itemized demands from the floor.
- One session could be devoted to proposals - all of which would be recorded & lightly discussed
- Proposals would be posted on the wiki / distributed on paper & the GA members would be given a few days to ruminate
- Items would be read in GA, just to review them.
- Perhaps there could be a "temperature check" on each item to make sure at least 50% of the GA would like to eventually vote on it
- Items would be read in GA, just to review them.
- After a few days' time, a dedicated GA session would review the demands. Perhaps this process could occur over the course of a few sessions, adding approved itms to a growing list to minimize the burn-out and loss of quorum that occurs when an entire list is discussed as a whole
- Final GA session to ratify the compilation of approved items after they have been individually agreed-upon
- One session could be devoted to proposals - all of which would be recorded & lightly discussed
- Next steps: each demand (i.e. "End corporate personhood!") could be used as a platform for launching more concrete proposals for actions, thus providing an organizational structure for discussions of the future of the movement
- Problem: A "list of demands" or "statements of purpose" seems like good ways to unite the movement behind a comprehensible (if general) platform