Road Map Planning: Difference between revisions

From wiki.occupyboston.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Test Summary)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
test test test test test test test test test
Below is the list of thoughts given at the first Road Map Planning Meeting. 
 
Strengths
 
Coherence of Group
Strength in Unity
Consensus (Horizontal Democracy)
Consumer Strategy Direct Action
Variety and amount of Creative Ideas and Energy
Exceptional Background of Skills
Working Together
Multiple Agenda’s
Transparency
Global Movement
The Opportunity to Meet New People
 
 
Weaknesses
 
Weaknesses
Resistance and refusal to address the concerns of marginalized groups AS central issues
Resistance and Refusal to Address Central Issues
Constant Crisis Mode
Reactive vs. Proactive
Multiple Agendas
Lots of Ideas, Not A lot of Strategy
Boring GA
Non Productive GA
No Definition of Non-Violence
Unresponsive from GA
People feel intimidated
Complexity of the Issues of the 1%
Agent Provocateurs
Thinking We Only Work Outside the System
Lacking Information Sharing
 
 
Opportunities
 
Healing
Non Violent Communication Training
Inter-Work Group Collaboration (2)
Maximize election year potential
Day of Rest
Promote Transparency
Opportunity to regroup
Morphing Physical Presence
Opportunity to Influence
Furthering cause, more attention to media and message
Looking to Define the Change
Networking with the world Social Forums
Building the Foundation
Training for Progress
In-depth Analysis of what was good and what wasn’t
Educational Opportunity for the 9(%
30/60 second elevator pitch
Selfless Autonomous Action
More non-violent training
Mass Movement Building
Win Hearts and Minds through intelligent debate
ideas and debates
Opportunities Continued
More Comprehensive Strategy
Parallel Organizing
Better Planned Direct Actions
Embrace Diversity of Tactics
Reaching Out to Other Occupations
Accessibility To All
 
Threats
 
Danger of Triviality
Bogged Down by Process
Coherence (In-Fighting)
Oppression
Burn Out
Duplicating efforts (too many parallel meetings)
Over emphasis on Semantics
Hostile Media
1%
Young Male “I don’t give a fuck attitude”
Egoism
Autonomous Action Without Thought
Lack of Respect for Divergent Thoughts
GA Not Respected
Agent Provocateurs
Elevate Actuality
Co-option
“Moccupation”
Lack of info-understanding what you are doing
Lack of Accountability
Eliticism

Revision as of 12:42, 16 December 2011

Below is the list of thoughts given at the first Road Map Planning Meeting.

Strengths

Coherence of Group Strength in Unity Consensus (Horizontal Democracy) Consumer Strategy Direct Action Variety and amount of Creative Ideas and Energy Exceptional Background of Skills Working Together Multiple Agenda’s Transparency Global Movement The Opportunity to Meet New People


Weaknesses

Weaknesses Resistance and refusal to address the concerns of marginalized groups AS central issues Resistance and Refusal to Address Central Issues Constant Crisis Mode Reactive vs. Proactive Multiple Agendas Lots of Ideas, Not A lot of Strategy Boring GA Non Productive GA No Definition of Non-Violence Unresponsive from GA People feel intimidated Complexity of the Issues of the 1% Agent Provocateurs Thinking We Only Work Outside the System Lacking Information Sharing


Opportunities

Healing Non Violent Communication Training Inter-Work Group Collaboration (2) Maximize election year potential Day of Rest Promote Transparency Opportunity to regroup Morphing Physical Presence Opportunity to Influence Furthering cause, more attention to media and message Looking to Define the Change Networking with the world Social Forums Building the Foundation Training for Progress In-depth Analysis of what was good and what wasn’t Educational Opportunity for the 9(% 30/60 second elevator pitch Selfless Autonomous Action More non-violent training Mass Movement Building Win Hearts and Minds through intelligent debate ideas and debates Opportunities Continued More Comprehensive Strategy Parallel Organizing Better Planned Direct Actions Embrace Diversity of Tactics Reaching Out to Other Occupations Accessibility To All

Threats

Danger of Triviality Bogged Down by Process Coherence (In-Fighting) Oppression Burn Out Duplicating efforts (too many parallel meetings) Over emphasis on Semantics Hostile Media 1% Young Male “I don’t give a fuck attitude” Egoism Autonomous Action Without Thought Lack of Respect for Divergent Thoughts GA Not Respected Agent Provocateurs Elevate Actuality Co-option “Moccupation” Lack of info-understanding what you are doing Lack of Accountability Eliticism