Public Discussion - Friday, November 4 2011: Difference between revisions

From wiki.occupyboston.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "== Friday, November 4 == Facilitator: Marty Facilitator: Forest Minutes: Mallory Stack Taker: None The discussion followed this format: *Introduction (10 minutes) *Breakout Gr...")
 
(Minor layout fixes)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Friday, November 4 ==
== Friday, November 4 ==


Facilitator: Marty Facilitator: Forest Minutes: Mallory Stack Taker: None
Facilitator: Marty<br/>
Facilitator: Forest<br/>
Minutes: Mallory<br/>
Stack Taker: None


The discussion followed this format:
The discussion followed this format:

Latest revision as of 21:20, 20 January 2012

Friday, November 4

Facilitator: Marty
Facilitator: Forest
Minutes: Mallory
Stack Taker: None

The discussion followed this format:

  • Introduction (10 minutes)
  • Breakout Group Formation (individuals on stack) (20 minutes)
  • Group Discussions (45 minutes)
  • Group Stack/Presentations (10 minutes per group x 3 groups = 30 minutes)
  • Conclusion/Summary

Breakout groups were formed after an opening discussion about what people wanted to talk about. The three breakout groups were:

  • Local Issues
  • Occupy as Paradigm Shift
  • Functional divisions in the movement and occupy boston (i.e. offline/online, onsite/offsite)

Some noted questions/comments that resulted at the end of discussion:

  • How does occupy reach into rural areas? Also, what about occupy gardens/farms?
  • How to include people whose time is filled with work obligations (i.e. how to occupy time the same way we are currently occupying space)?
  • "laboratory space" to describe our ideas discussions.

Two functional issues with discussion format identified by facilitator (Forest) were:

  • Breakout groups for the most part lacked facilitation, stack taker, timekeepers, or minute recorders. In the future groups should ideally follow an established process for discussion.
  • People who tended to agree seemed to clump together in the smaller groups. Maybe experimenting with starting groups with members randomly assigned and *then* applying law of two feet would be worthwhile? Also, instructing group initiators to make sure their group has someone taking stack?