SGCC Web Page Development Map: Difference between revisions

From wiki.occupyboston.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (THE AWFUL TRUTH)
Line 1: Line 1:
OVERALL; CONTENTS OF WEB PAGES ARE MOSTLY PIECES TAKEN FROM FAQ/NARRATIVE, RIGHT?  BUT, THE PIECES SHOULD BE PICKED BETTER--- AND WE SHOULD THINK MORE CAREFULLY--- WHAT DO WE WANT EACH PAGE ON THE SITE TO DO?  OUR ORGANIZATION OF THE PAGES IS VERY SCATTERSHOT. ONLY THE FIRST PAGE IS OK, NOT GREAT.
[[SGCC Main Page "Home"]]  {this is ok now...}
[[SGCC Main Page "Home"]]  {this is ok now...}



Revision as of 00:04, 8 March 2013

OVERALL; CONTENTS OF WEB PAGES ARE MOSTLY PIECES TAKEN FROM FAQ/NARRATIVE, RIGHT? BUT, THE PIECES SHOULD BE PICKED BETTER--- AND WE SHOULD THINK MORE CAREFULLY--- WHAT DO WE WANT EACH PAGE ON THE SITE TO DO? OUR ORGANIZATION OF THE PAGES IS VERY SCATTERSHOT. ONLY THE FIRST PAGE IS OK, NOT GREAT.


SGCC Main Page "Home" {this is ok now...}

SGCC "About" page {why do we have an "about" page and a "FAQ " page-- "About" does not accomplish much...

SGCC "FAQ" page {Why is this "FAQ" different from the "FAQ/NARRATIVE", which is better? Strongly suggest deleting "About" and "FAQ", and replacing both with the FAQ/Narrative from the Wiki-- it is complete, up to date accurate, reads very well.}

SGCC "Services" page {This also should be deleted-- FAQ? Narrative covers it, {and this is full of gramatical errors, etc.}

SGCC "Support SGCC" page {problem; contents of this are supposed to be about the "politics" of why we should be supported, right? But FAQ/Narrative has much more on that-- about coops, about green cleaning, about envir., and about empowering thru work. All of that "socio-political" stuff should go here}