Oct 30 2011
14:32:04 ross: we're doing introductions at the meeting...now 14:32:09--> lovecrime|netbook [~firstname.lastname@example.org] has joined #occupybostonIT 14:32:15 kizmut: The moderator set the rule to only allow people involved in that part of the agenda to speak, but someone -m the room. 14:32:23 seekr: WEll, maybe it's best to hold meetings in private rooms where people aren't allowed to participate or vote unless they are known - and can be assured to know what's going on. 14:32:27 kizmut: ...and it wasn't yman who did it. 14:33:03 farmerbob: ross: at e5? 14:33:05 seekr: Well, it may have been atom who gave voice to KeKe and myself - I'd have to check my log file. 14:33:19 kizmut: The wule was just that seekr. yman created the rule and it made sense, but someone -m the room. 14:33:22 seekr: As for the others you referred to, I can't say. 14:33:24 kizmut: *rule 14:33:36 ross: Ross, grainne, brandon, stephen, ravi, martin, 14:33:45 ross: farmerbob: yes we are at e5 14:34:04 farmerbob: ross: should be there. but would be coughing all over everybody 14:34:13 kizmut: seekr- We must stop. The OBIT meeting has assembled. 14:34:30 ross: Mike K...farmerbob consider yourself here! 14:34:32 seekr: kizmut, Yes. That's why I've grown quiet. :) 14:34:55 seekr: kizmut, But thanks much for patiently explaining things to me! 14:34:58 lovecrime|netbook: it's all intros right now 14:35:12 kizmut: certainly 14:35:34 ross: Mike K says he wants to act as a liason between all the other tech groups in the occupy movement. 14:35:58 kizmut: Hoe many are there? 14:36:01 kizmut: *How 14:36:04 lovecrime|netbook: ~13 14:36:10 kizmut: wow 14:36:41 ross: dana teaches at mass art in a tech area of the school. 14:37:18 ross: dana...puts power utilization on the agenda. 14:37:47 ross: noah, working with facilitation and ideas, and to work in the future on the wiki. (which he puts on the agenda. 14:37:50 ross: ) 14:38:44--> g|mobile [~email@example.com] has joined #occupybostonIT 14:39:26 ross: stewart has spent much time working on tech...hasn't really figured out where he fits with the tech team yet. 14:39:57 ross: jarod lovecrime|netbook wants an occupyboston email...into everything and not great at anything. 14:40:37 ross: stephan is hanging out visiting brandon. 14:41:00 ross: Agenda: 14:41:09 ross: 1. Power 14:41:15 ross: 2. Wiki 14:41:19--> KeKe [KeKe@47g0279u.bb.sky.com] has joined #occupybostonIT 14:41:23 ross: 3. Process 14:41:33 ross: 4. Cloudflare 14:41:58 ross: 5. Livestream 14:42:18<-- lovecrime|netbook [~firstname.lastname@example.org] has quit (Ping timeout: 258 seconds) 14:42:21--> mcktimo [~email@example.com] has joined #occupybostonIT 14:42:53 ross: 6. Working group web developent 14:43:23 smant: ross, I got my phone hooked up to the livestream apparently, I can livestream marches/events where livestreaming off a phone would be of use. I wouldn't mind testing it out at some point. Don't know if/how that helps you :-P 14:44:00 ross: smant: great! 14:44:07--> lovecrime|netbook [~firstname.lastname@example.org] has joined #occupybostonIT 14:44:54 smant: The wiki on the subject is clearly for iOS though, and some instructions didn't seem to apply to Android. I'm not a iClown :( 14:45:50 ross: Ideas wants to have some way to have people add comments to the wiki where they do not need to register or login... $inputBox is one extension. 14:46:09 ross: The easiest way for people to just add ideas would be something like input box. 14:46:19 brandon: mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:InputBox 14:47:13 ross: wants to have a way to communicate with someone who can install a module. 14:48:53 ross: Wants to create a set of tags to do research with them. 14:49:46 ross: Want people to tag their own documents...thinking about a gamified way to connect the tigs. 14:50:16 ross: Wants people to be able to offer input on the ways tags are intertwined and connected. 14:51:02 ross: Would like to have the input box be on the frontpage and the user input would be added to the pages with those tags. 14:52:56 ross: Ravi: sounds like the problem is that people want to become editors ... just add a comment on the site...but comments create significant problems. 14:54:24 ross: what if instead of changing the wiki...we just add a link to the webpage to comment on a blog. 14:54:37 ross: brandon: says it would be trivial to set this up on the wiki. 14:55:43 farmerbob: so we want people to contribute to the wiki without registering? or is there some other distinction i'm missing 14:55:46 farmerbob: ? 14:56:22 ross: farmerbob: that's the idea...but not to edit pages. 14:56:44 farmerbob: disqus? 14:56:53 brandon: disqus isn't a bad idea 14:57:14 ross: now we're suggesting that instead of the content being stored on the wiki it would be better faster to do a link out to the webpage. 14:59:36 ross: so we will create a development environment on the wiki. 15:00:04 lovecrime|netbook: disqus is an interesting idea 15:00:12 ross: noah wants to experiment with different ideas. 15:00:16 lovecrime|netbook: who owns the tech for disqus? 15:00:17 kizmut: The wiki is also used for posting proposals for example the GA. 15:01:21 ross: farmerbob: we're bringing up discus I didn't know it was a platform. 15:01:42 alwillis: You probably want Intense Debate instead of Disqus: http://intensedebate.com/ 15:02:43 farmerbob: i don't know. i threw that out there, but i don't really know what the application is... 15:02:45 lovecrime|netbook: concern that disqus is proprietary 15:02:50 ross: noah wants this to be integrated with the wiki. 15:04:21 brandon: medaiwiki.org/wiki/Extension:OpenID 15:04:24 ross: suggestion to implement openID on the media wiki. 15:04:50 farmerbob: can we narrow the focus here a bit? what's the desired functionality? or are these unrelated features? 15:05:21 ross: openID was a suggestion to make login easier. 15:06:33 farmerbob: we went from comment intake to implementing openid...(for what it's worth, my experience hasn't indicated that many people actually *use* openid when you offer it) 15:07:08 ross: noah will link to the blog post. 15:07:26 ross: Action: 15:07:43 ross: 2. Development environment of wiki. 15:08:08 lovecrime|netbook: farmerbob: check pm 15:08:15 ross: 3. Add openid, inputbox, and look into forms . 15:10:34 farmerbob: is there an option in mediawiki to just install all modules that exist? 15:11:13 brandon: farmerbob: :D 15:13:56 brandon: Talking about Process/Cloudflare now 15:14:19* farmerbob raises hand. 15:15:47 farmerbob: 1) *all* (in|out)bound web traffic (to|from) *.occupyboston.org is flowing through cloudflare.com 15:16:21 farmerbob: 2) dns records for *.occupyboston.org are pointing to occupyboston.org (tightly related to #1) 15:16:23@marxistvegan: Ross is talking about the cloudflare and explaining what cloudflare does 15:17:10 farmerbob: 3) i didn't see a single mention of this on the list, where we were all given the sense that we needed to work toward being more self-sufficient and secure in providing infrastructure for OB, etc. 15:17:12--> ndmc [~email@example.com] has joined #occupybostonIT 15:17:24<-- ndmc [~firstname.lastname@example.org] has quit (Client Quit) 15:17:29--> ndmc [~email@example.com] has joined #occupybostonIT 15:17:33<-- ndmc [~firstname.lastname@example.org] has quit (Client Quit) 15:18:19 farmerbob: 4) this amounts to voluntarily putting a third party in the middle of all our web traffic. and it seems to have been done unilaterally. 15:18:25 brandon: Ross says finance wants a secure subdomain for sensitive documents and that traffic would also pass through these servers 15:19:04 farmerbob: (#2, the second occupyboston.org should say cloudflare.com) 15:20:38 ross: g|mobile: says there are two things. MF/PL was an active decision about security, and the issue of not having a chance to decide upon the process. 15:21:02 ross: brandon: says there was no consensus about the decision. 15:21:28<-- alwillis [~email@example.com] has quit (Quit: alwillis) 15:21:51 farmerbob: i didn't even see any *discussion* much less *consensus* 15:29:14<-- mcktimo [~firstname.lastname@example.org] has quit (Quit: CGI:IRC (Ping timeout)) 15:29:50 ross: sorry farmerbob we're trying to develop a process now. 15:30:47 ross: what criteria for individual action. 15:31:28 ross: Anything Involving information security must be a consensus decision. 15:35:25--> Shidash [~Shidash@r-88-461-552-58.hsd9.ma.comcast.net] has joined #occupybostonIT 15:39:37 ross: talking about a three level process...Large decisions such as DNS, Mid-level changes need an email list consensus, and individual actions that can be made without approval. 15:40:42--> ndmc [~email@example.com] has joined #occupybostonIT 15:40:52 ross: <ross> talking about a three level process...Large decisions such as DNS, 15:40:53 ross: Mid-level changes need an email list consensus, and individual actions 15:40:53 ross: that can be made without approval. [15:39] 15:40:53 ross: 15:41:38 ross: if you are modifying the route of traffic, you must have 8 person in person consensus. 15:42:06<-- Shidash [~Shidash@r-88-461-552-58.hsd9.ma.comcast.net] has quit (Ping timeout: 258 seconds) 15:42:49 ross: for a mid-level decision you should have 8 person consensus on the email list. if someone suggests that a mid-level decision is actually a big decision it must be treated as such. 15:56:45 ndmc: Major Decision Process (This is a living Document) In the interest of both transparency and inclusion, major decisions about our online resources (such as DNS routing, hosting, and SSL implementation) must be decided through consensus in an in-person working group meeting with at least 8 people. Less important decisions that do not affect routing or data security must be supported by 8 OBIT WG members on the email list or the IRC. 15:57:18 ndmc: above proposal was consenesd on by OBIT WG 10/30/11 15:58:04<-- ndmc [~firstname.lastname@example.org] has quit (Quit: CGI:IRC (EOF)) 16:00:14 farmerbob: is there to be any discussion of this specific matter, the cloudflame situation? 16:00:26 brandon: farmerbob: we're talking about it right now 16:01:22 ross: ravi wants to table the discussion...stephen is arguing that cloudflare sends us back to where we started with wordpress.org 16:01:56 farmerbob: table the discussion? until when? 16:02:10 ross: whenever it fits ravi's schedule better. 16:02:28 farmerbob: it's *worse* than wordpress.org, because it's all the subdomains... 16:03:04 farmerbob: frankly, this is a more pressing matter than the question of putting an input box on the wiki, yet we had time for that... 16:05:09 ross: it was because noah had to leave early. 16:06:01 farmerbob: understood. but this seems to be a high priority issue, especially considering the man-hours contributed in switching stuff from wordpress.com and google groups only to have *all* the traffic routed through a third-party 16:07:21 ross: I agree... 16:09:43<-- g|mobile [~email@example.com] has quit (Remote host closed the connection) 16:24:20 ross: okay we just voted on asking gregg to point the ns records to mayfirst.org. 16:24:40 ross: reached consensus 16:25:36 ross: dana is telling us where we are with the pedal units. There are three on the ground at camp right now. The inverters and one of the batteries got stolen, and so they sat not working for a few days. 16:26:06 ross: Decided that some of the problems about power on camp are not technical but social problems. 16:26:16 kizmut: I am impressed that someone got away with a battery. 16:26:26 ross: lol 16:26:36 kizmut: Is the outlet on the building still dead? 16:26:55 kizmut: I believe the coffee pot blew the breaker. 16:27:07 ross: people are concerned that they need cell phones for marches, specifically for direct action. 16:27:25 ross: the kitchen also wants a good method for lighting...using 12 volt power. 16:27:36 kizmut: I told Alex to write down his proposal for a family plant. 16:27:47 ross: they have done this with new led technology. 16:28:16 kizmut: I take it he hasn't shared it yet. 16:28:24--> g|mobile [~firstname.lastname@example.org] has joined #occupybostonIT 16:28:29 ross: want to get pedal power to charge the batteries. 16:28:48 ross: medical tent and food powered. 16:28:54 kizmut: I've seen the LED's. they definitely need more of them. 16:29:02 ross: need to determine who else needs power. 16:29:16 ross: also we need another repeater for the network. 16:30:06 kizmut: Perhaps relocate a repeater for optimal coverage? 16:30:53 ross: another idea is to have a mobile charger. 16:31:24 ross: this also solves the security problem. 16:34:13 kizmut: There's a company that sells a portable solar and VAWT charging station. 16:34:27 kizmut: It is weatherproof. 16:43:12 kizmut: http://envirosponsible.com/Wind_Generators.html 16:43:30 farmerbob: ross: matt and i talked about putting together backpacks to act as mobile charging stations. we were shot down repeatedly. 16:44:07--> matt2 [~email@example.com] has joined #occupybostonIT 16:44:14 ross: farmerbob: dana has talked about this as well.