Talk:Mutual Aid: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(response to proposal: No way!) |
m (moved Talk:Mutual Aid Working Group to Talk:Mutual Aid: Naming conventions) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Here's my vote: No way!== | ==Here's my vote: No way!== | ||
'''Fact: Occupy Boston is not a welfare provider.'''<br> | '''Fact: Occupy Boston is <u>not</u> a welfare provider.'''<br> | ||
We need to have a much more broad conversation regarding what should be done with OB's (donation-based?) funds. There are some questions we should be asking: | We need to have a much more broad conversation regarding what should be done with OB's (donation-based?) funds. There are some questions we should be asking: | ||
* Where did the money come from? | * Where did the money come from? | ||
Latest revision as of 17:57, 9 March 2012
Here's my vote: No way!
Fact: Occupy Boston is not a welfare provider.
We need to have a much more broad conversation regarding what should be done with OB's (donation-based?) funds. There are some questions we should be asking:
- Where did the money come from?
- For what causes do you think the donations were made?
- How did our sponsors expect their money to be spent?
- How was the Occupy 'environment' at the time the majority of the donations were received?
- How is the environment now? How does it compare to the environment when donations were received?
This suggestion should probably be compared with the HQ working group and their agenda.
- OneKarmaT/C 20:43, 29 December 2011 (EST)