Guiding Principles for Property Destruction: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
While Occupy Boston recognizes that it can not control and does not want to control individual autonomous action, it rejects intentional property destruction as a protest tactic. Occupy Boston does not feel that it is helpful to the movement for intentional property destruction to be associated with the movement. This is with the exception of property destruction in defense of immediate bodily harm. This is with the exception of a member destroying his or her own property. | While Occupy Boston recognizes that it can not control and does not want to control individual autonomous action, it rejects intentional property destruction as a protest tactic. Occupy Boston does not feel that it is helpful to the movement for intentional property destruction to be associated with the movement. This is with the exception of property destruction in defense of immediate bodily harm. This is with the exception of a member destroying his or her own property. | ||
[[Thoughts about Property Destruction as a Tactic]] | |||
Revision as of 18:50, 14 February 2012
DRAFT proposal:
While Occupy Boston recognizes that it can not control and does not want to control individual autonomous action, it rejects intentional property destruction as a protest tactic. Occupy Boston does not feel that it is helpful to the movement for intentional property destruction to be associated with the movement. This is with the exception of property destruction in defense of immediate bodily harm. This is with the exception of a member destroying his or her own property.