Talk:Occupy Boston: Difference between revisions
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
This begs the question of why we need to reproduce the Working Groups page on the main page anyway. It might be better to describe what Working Groups are on the main page an give a link to page itself.[[User:Mcktimo|Mcktimo]] 23:48, 6 November 2011 (EST) | This begs the question of why we need to reproduce the Working Groups page on the main page anyway. It might be better to describe what Working Groups are on the main page an give a link to page itself.[[User:Mcktimo|Mcktimo]] 23:48, 6 November 2011 (EST) | ||
*I agree. --[[User:JSDwyer|JSDwyer]] 23:57, 6 November 2011 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 23:57, 6 November 2011
Rename: Occupy Boston
This is a suggestion to rename the 'Main Page' as 'Occupy Boston'. 'Main Page' is nondescript and generic, and generally looks bad when a visitor comes to the site.
If we 'move' the main page, how will the structure be affected? Will the header image lose its function?
I'm going to move it for now and see what happens. It can always be moved back. If no major loss of function occurs, I will keep the new name.
--OneKarma 15:22, 5 November 2011 (EDT)
- Good idea. --JSDwyer 23:57, 6 November 2011 (EST)
on not having many versions of the same text
Working Groups are listed both on the main page and on the Working Groups page. They didn't match. So I used the translocation thing to display the Working Groups page within the main page. To do it I put {{:Working Groups}} as a line on the main page. Editing there will take you to the Working Groups page and update both.
This begs the question of why we need to reproduce the Working Groups page on the main page anyway. It might be better to describe what Working Groups are on the main page an give a link to page itself.Mcktimo 23:48, 6 November 2011 (EST)
- I agree. --JSDwyer 23:57, 6 November 2011 (EST)