Revising Our Concept of Government

Revision as of 15:12, 4 January 2014 by Terra (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is a page for ideas on how to restructure government to serve people better.

This page is intended to be "beyond that which is on the table currently". The page is broken up into two sections. Long term, for extremely radical ideas...such as removing all currency. The top half is for radical reformation ideas.

This page emerged from the discussion about how corporations have too much control over our government and what to do about it.


Establish RIGHT TO COMMONS, and basic needs

  • - right to basic shelter
  • - right to basic healthcare
  • - right to clean water
  • - right to clean air
  • - right to healthy food
  • - right to basic internet access
  • - right to living wage

All corporations must respect these rights or be taxed to pay for costs associated with satisfying those rights, with specific penalties associated with the overhead of clean up and retroactive punity.

Change NSA's Mission to SUPPORT those rights

Have NSA go after the real criminals. Wall Street. Polluters. Worker-abuse. The NSA has NO INCENTIVE to look at Wall Street, or banks. And the agencies that DO have the mission to prevent financial misdeeds to our currency and other crimes against nature are NOT COVERED in NSA's mission. NSA's mission is to look for physical/virtual threats according to an archaic definition of threats. We would (could?) redefine what a threat to the public is, including ripping us off, pollution, lying, etc. THAT would be the most useful thing I could think of for NSA. And the NSA employees might actually like that shift in mission. It might actually help the commerc and SEC to "do their job" if that mission was shifted. That being said, we need to revise our whole concept of public responsibility. Currently, too much of "our government" is focused on protection of profit. This evolved from the early days of the constitution which protected the right to private opposed to the King owning all of it. The intention, as I read the records, was to protect the right for a farmer to own enough to feed his family, NOT for the right to rip off the entire nation. BUT a lot of case law has evolved to set the stage for the gov't effectly being used as the "piracy guarantee corporation", to keep the public out of the get away route.


ANARCHY: Return to local rule by tribal council, or no rule at all. Total anarchy. [I put this here, to let you know that I understand that some people want this, and that it may be completely possible long term. Personally, I (Terra) am focusing on Radical Reformation, but want a space to put ideas for advanced thinking]