User:Mcktimo/on organizing the wiki: Difference between revisions

From wiki.occupyboston.org
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
Working Groups could reflect these 2 functions as follows:
Working Groups could reflect these 2 functions as follows:
#a public face that includes a presentation of the best and most succinct work of the group. The focus is on people not in the group per se.
#a public face that includes a presentation of the best and most succinct work of the group. The focus is on people not in the group per se.
#a workspace for the work group with random ides links discussions and drafts that are mercilessly edited in good spirit.
#a workspace for the work group with random ideas, links, discussions and drafts that are mercilessly edited in good spirit.
Perhaps there could be a naming convention WG-transparency.
Perhaps there could be a naming convention WG-transparency.

Revision as of 16:34, 22 October 2011

Create a more democratic space

Users and User(Working)groups can have their own page hierarchy, useful for collecting and sharing and organizing within that group but not in the main page space. The idea of a public face existing alongside a 'workspace'.

One might say the existing wiki is a collection of manifestos read only by their authors. Ok so now everyone has a personal set of pages where they can put their own stuff. Perhaps this is an important part of developing our community.

leave the hierarchy flat

Don't pretend to know how this space will organize. Allow it to organize itself. Rules about /WG/OBIT/littlebit are not really in the spirit of wiki. Look at mediawiki, millions of articles all in the main page space.

that being said...

put Working groups in the user: space

Consider the wiki as serving 2 functions. One is to present a compelling collection of ideas in support of the occupy movement. The other function is as a space that helps to grow this movement. This part is a little messier.

Working Groups could reflect these 2 functions as follows:

  1. a public face that includes a presentation of the best and most succinct work of the group. The focus is on people not in the group per se.
  2. a workspace for the work group with random ideas, links, discussions and drafts that are mercilessly edited in good spirit.

Perhaps there could be a naming convention WG-transparency.